Pulse of the Land | Public Land, Private Gain
Decisions made quietly in Washington this week will shape what's left of our wild places for the next generation.
"We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors; we borrow it from our children."
Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
This Week’s Take
This week, the fate of the Boundary Waters hangs on a Senate vote that could arrive any day, while the administration continues pressing forward on the Roadless Rule despite one of the most lopsided public comment records in regulatory history. Quietly in the background, the Congressional Review Act is being stretched into territory it was never designed to reach. The tools being used: budget proposals, obscure legislative procedures, fast-tracked mining bills. This is a moment worth watching closely.
1. The Roadless Rule Is on Its Deathbed — And 60 Million Acres Hang in the Balance | April 9, 2026
The federal government is moving forward with plans to rescind the Roadless Area Conservation Rule, a 2001 policy that has protected around 60 million acres of public lands from road construction, logging, mining, and other development. Despite receiving over 600,000 public comments with up to 99% in support of keeping the rule. The administration is pressing ahead with the rollback. A final decision is expected in late 2026. Comments still matter and will live in the legal record for future lawsuit.
Why It Matters for Public Lands: The Roadless Rule has been a vital source of clean drinking water, with national forests acting as a natural water purifying system of roots and soil that filters water as it moves toward groundwater aquifers. Critics have called it “the single largest evisceration of public lands in U.S. history” if it goes through What makes this story particularly egregious and underreported, is that the administration received one of the most lopsided public comment records in regulatory history and is pressing forward anyway, raising serious questions about whether public participation in land management still means anything. Again, comments live for legal record, so they matter. Next step, understand where your representitives stand on this and vote in November.
I write this, build this, and fund this myself, while keeping it free. If you find any value in this, a coffee goes a long way.
2. The Boundary Waters Senate Vote Could Happen This Week | April 13, 2026
House Republicans voted to undo former President Biden’s 20-year moratorium on the extraction of copper, nickel, and other minerals across more than 225,000 acres near the popular Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. If approved by the Republican-controlled Senate, the resolution would next go to President Trump, who has indicated he would sign it into law.
The Congressional Resolution deadline runs out towards the end of April. The vote could come anytime after Monday, April 13, and advocacy groups warn that when it’s scheduled, supporters typically get only 24 to 48 hours’ notice.
Why It Matters for Public Lands: If this resolution passes, it would do more than overturn the existing withdrawal. Under the Congressional Review Act, it would also prevent any future administration from issuing a substantially similar protection without new authorization from Congress. This is more then a story about one mine, it is a story about whether a procedural tool can permanently close the door on a category of protection for public lands.
3. Congress Is Moving to Let Mining Companies Skip Environmental Review on Public Lands | April 7, 2026
A suite of bills making their way through Congress would fast-track mining projects on public lands while eliminating environmental reviews and public input, using “national security” and “energy dominance” as cover. The most concerning of these is H.R. 7458, the Domestic ORE Act, sponsored by Representative Harriet Hageman of Wyoming. If passed, the bill would massively expand the amount of national public land that is open for mineral exploration with no environmental review or public input.
According to the Colorado College State of the Rockies Project 2026 poll, 70 percent of Western voters oppose fast-tracking mining and other projects on national public lands by limiting environmental reviews and local input.
Why It Matters for Public Lands: This bill is receiving almost no national coverage. If enacted, mining companies could move heavy equipment onto public land, including trails and recreation areas, with just a 15-day notice and no opportunity for communities to weigh in. The gap between what Western voters say they want and what Congress is advancing here is significant.
4. Grand Staircase-Escalante Becomes the First National Monument Targeted by the Congressional Review Act | April 1, 2026
Congress has already used the Congressional Review Act to overturn six BLM land management plans this session, covering lands in Montana, Wyoming, Alaska and North Dakota. But conservation groups say applying it to a national monument goes further. Monument designations are meant to elevate conservation over extraction, unlike standard resource management plans. If the management plan is rescinded, 700,000 acres that were briefly opened to mining and oil and gas leasing under the first Trump administration could again become available. The monument sits atop the Kaiparowits coal field, one of the largest untapped coal deposits in the country.
A coalition of 125 organizations has sent a letter to Congress urging them to oppose the effort, writing that the Congressional Review Act “was never meant to be a blunt instrument to attack public lands, including national monuments.”
Why It Matters for Public Lands: Six tribal nations that helped shape the plan through the Grand Staircase-Escalante Inter-Tribal Coalition are opposing the effort. This is the first time in American history the Congressional Review Act has been used against a national monument management plan. If it succeeds, no monument management plan in the country can be considered secure.
5. The FY2027 Budget Proposes to Redirect Nearly Half of America's Core Conservation Fund | April 6, 2026
The White House budget proposes restricting the Land and Water Conservation Fund to easements and blocking new public land acquisition. Voters in red and blue states alike have consistently backed the LWCF because it is the single best tool for increasing access to public lands, especially for hunters and anglers.
The administration’s budget proposes to gut the LWCF by diverting nearly $387 million roughly 43% of the fund away from conservation, recreation, and sportsmen’s access needs across the country.
Why It Matters for Public Lands: The LWCF is funded entirely by offshore oil and gas royalties, it costs taxpayers nothing, and has supported parks, trails, wildlife refuges, and hunting access in every county in the country. The proposed diversion breaks a bipartisan commitment signed into law by President Trump himself in 2020. That contradiction is not getting the attention it deserves.
Thank you for reading! Wild places don’t come back. Conservation Current tracks the policies, projects, and decisions eating away at America’s public lands, and holds the energy industry accountable when it takes the easy path over the right one.
I write this, build this, and fund this myself. If you find any value in this, a coffee goes a long way.
Check out The Conservation Current Public Land Policy Tracker surfaces the five most impactful open comment periods and regulatory actions on federal public lands. Ranked by scale, irreversibility, and deadline urgency. Updated weekly. Always verify deadlines at regulations.gov before submitting.